Hello,
We always strive to ensure that the performance metrics of our websites are at their maximum. We use several tools for this control, but for this moment, I will use PageSpeed Insights to illustrate the problem.
After migrating our site to Ezoic, we experienced performance issues, particularly with the Interaction to Next Paint metric. When viewed in "My Scores" in the "Leap" Tool, we see a rapid increase in time, as seen in the image below:
To investigate the issues, I chose the page https://www.oracaoonline.com.br/oracao-de-sao-judas-tadeu, which according to the "Leap" report had the worst performance in the last day.
I generated a report for this page, and the result was very alarming as can be seen: https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-www-oracaoonline-com-br-oracao-de-sao-judas-tadeu/mafk7vuv2a?form_factor=mobile
For comparison purposes, accessing the same page directly from our server can be done through another address without Ezoic's intervention, and requesting the report for this same page, we have the maximum score as seen in the test https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-editor-oracaoonline-com-br-oracao-de-sao-judas-tadeu/y37uak02h8?form_factor=mobile
Analyzing the issues, we can see problems with Largest Contentful Paint at 3.1s versus 1.3s for the page without Ezoic. It's important to note that the 1.3s time is not using CDN.
Another problem is the Total Blocking Time, which is at 4,960 ms. This is a very long time for this parameter. I know it will be a bit higher due to the ads, but it seems very exaggerated even in this case.
Now, regarding the search for solutions, on https://support.ezoic.com/, I only found some pages suggesting configurations that were already done in my Leap.
So, I came here to seek some help. Does anyone have any tips?